Имущественные преступления в Калифорнии-закон о безопасных районах и школах - Студенческий научный форум

XII Международная студенческая научная конференция Студенческий научный форум - 2020

Имущественные преступления в Калифорнии-закон о безопасных районах и школах

 Комментарии
Текст работы размещён без изображений и формул.
Полная версия работы доступна во вкладке "Файлы работы" в формате PDF

The purpose of this law is to reduce certain non-violent felonies to misdemeanors, such as possession of drugs, shoplifting, writing bad checks, and others. Proposition 47 allows defendants charged and convicted of certain felonies to petition the court to reduce such a conviction to a misdemeanor conviction.

Many employers will not hire a person convicted of a felony, but will hire a person convicted of only a misdemeanor.

Some НачалоформыКонецформыcrimes in California may be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor, in the discretion of the District Attorney’s Office. These crimes are called “wobblers” because they “wobble” between being a felony and being a misdemeanor.

Most property crimes are “wobblers.” Thus, over time, many property-crime cases which could have been charged as misdemeanors were actually charged as felonies. Under Proposition 47, if the value of the property in a property crime case was $950 or less, the felony conviction should be reduced to a misdemeanor.

Receiving a Stolen Property, Penal Code § 496, is another “wobbler” offense.

In a recent case, People v Wehr, the defendant was convicted of Receiving Stolen Property, a vehicle. The vehicle in question was valued at under $950. Wehr was charged with, and convicted of felony P.C. § 496 and sentenced to 9 years in State Prison.

Wehr petitioned under Prop 47 to have the court reduce his sentence on the basis that Prop 47 made his crime a misdemeanor, and therefore punishable with only one year in county jail at most. The judge denied his motion and affirmed the sentence of 9 years in State Prison.

In the original proceedings, the prosecution, presented no evidence as to the value of the stolen vehicle. To prove felony P.C. § 496, it was the prosecution’s burden to prove the vehicle had value of $951 or more.

When Wehr filed an appeal, the appellate court took into consideration the legislative intent of Proposition 47, as stated by a Legislative Analyst in the voter’s pamphlet for such. It stated, “. . . after Proposition 47’s passage, receiving stolen property worth $950 or less would always be a misdemeanor.” (Voter Information Guide, Gen. Elec., Analysis of Prop. 47 by Legis. Analyst, p. 35, emphasis added.)

The pamphlet did not distinguish between receiving stolen vehicles and other types of property. Thus, the most reasonable interpretation of Proposition 47 as it applies to P.C. § 496 is that Receiving a Stolen Vehicle worth $950 or less, just like receiving any other stolen property worth $950 or less, is always a misdemeanor.

In Wehr, the appellate court held consistent with the above reasoning, that the Legislature’s intent in drafting Proposition 47, and the voters’ intent in passing such, was to have conviction of a P.C. § 496 charge wherein the property is a vehicle having either an unproven or proven-to-be-only-$950-or-less value, must result in only a misdemeanor conviction for such.

For Mr. Wehr specifically, the appellate court ruled the prosecution could either accept reduction of his conviction to a misdemeanor, or retry the case wherein the prosecution would be permitted to introduce evidence that the value of the vehicle was $951 or more.

Список литературы

Шумилов В.М., Акчурин Т.Ф.: Правовая система США. Учебное пособие

"Воспоминания фундаментального юриста", Майкл Мансфилд

Просмотров работы: 258